Scenario: NH receives disability. But elects retirement to avoid w/c offset. At age 65 we get an alert reminding us that w/c ends at age 65. Why can't we just put the NH back to the advantageous dib and explain the action rather than soliciting for a statement to elect dib. If you think about it, the NH already is dib but just receiving rib. The development of age 65 creates extra cases, extra development.
Voting on Ideas
Vote for your favorite ideas by clicking on the up arrow.To undo an upvote, simply click the arrow again. This second click removes your vote.